Commentary from Sagadahoc Democrats

In Light of Roe

I am enraged and alarmed by the recent Supreme Court decision overturning Roe. As discouraging and disturbing as this is, what comes to me most right now is how critical it is that each of us votes and registers our opposition to this action and to the far-right Republicans using this lopsided, ultra-conservative Supreme Court to further their extreme goals.

The Supreme Court decision has stripped away women’s rights, dismissing the dangers and potentially devastating outcomes of carrying an unwanted child, or of bringing a high-risk pregnancy to term. The Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe despite assurances by three recent nominees that they would protect this right because it is settled law. Through this ruling, the Court has imposed their own personal and religious beliefs on the entire country. This ruling stands in stark contrast to where a solid majority of Americans stand on the issue today.

And indications are that this is just the beginning. Clarence Thomas has suggested that the court also revisit the right to use birth control, engage in gay relationships or same-sex marriage. The Court recently expanded gun rights, and in a major blow to the fight against climate change the court has limited the EPA’s ability to regulate powerplant emissions.  

Which is why it all comes back to our votes, because this is just a symptom of the ongoing attempt among Republicans to embrace minority rule in this country. Trump successfully created this ultra-conservative court with his three supreme court nominees, making it little more than a political arm of the RNC. And we shouldn’t forget that Maine’s own Susan Collins voted to approve each of them – she cannot lament being misled when she begged to be fooled.

Republicans claim to be pro-life, so concerned about the rights of the fetus—and yet they are not at all concerned about what happens once a child is born. In fact, they are adamantly against programs such as universal pre-k, affordable childcare, and other family benefit programs to support families and children once they are born. They claim to be pro-life, but are unwilling to enact reasonable, common-sense gun safety laws.  

The Supreme Courts’ decision on abortion leaves it to individual states to decide on abortion policy. And while we would hope that our rights would be protected at the federal level, it is now incumbent on the States to do so. This makes our votes to elect state and local leaders committed to a progressive agenda, more critical than ever. As Mainers, for example, it’s critical we ensure that LePage not get re-elected, as his administration would quickly take up SCOTUS’ effort and squash women’s right to choose, our civil rights and our efforts to save the planet. 

If there ever were a time to raise our voices and say we will not accept that a conservative republican agenda be imposed on us, this time is now. If there was ever a time to say that all politics is local, this time is now.

Marcy Leger
Bath

Fascism in America

“Do you know how it feels to have the president of the U.S. target you?” asked Ruby Freeman, a former Black election worker from Georgia. Her life, and that of her daughter, Shaye Moss (also a former election worker), were turned upside down when they were falsely accused of having participated in rigging the 2020 presidential election in their state. These brave women testified at the January 6 Congressional hearings, Moss in person and Freeman on video to refute those charges, and to describe what followed.

They both have endured violent threats to their lives, many of them racist in nature, and have suffered physical and verbal harassment to themselves and their families. Moss said that many of the messages were “hateful… a lot of threats wishing me dead, telling me I’ll be in jail with my mother, and saying things like, ‘Be glad it’s 2020 and not 1920.’” And the threats were not exclusively verbal ones; Trumpers tried to break into her grandmother’s house, searching for evidence of fraud.

In response, Moss and Freeman effectively went into hiding. During the week of January 6, Freeman left her home for her own safety as directed by the FBI. Moss was, and no doubt still is, afraid to go to the grocery store for fear that acquaintances might say her name and call attention to her from Trumpers. Freeman had a T-shirt inscribed “Lady Ruby” she won’t wear now. She claims, “I’ve lost my name and I’ve lost my reputation, and I’ve lost my sense of security.”

Such threats were perpetrated by the Donald Trump administration and those who support it, and represent the stock-in-trade of autocratic regimes from the Third Reich to dictatorships in Africa, Southeast Asia and in South America. Now it is happening here. Freeman and Moss are not alone; Rusty Bowers (R-Speaker of the Arizona House) testified that Trump supporters swarmed his house (which was sheltering, among others, his “gravely ill” daughter) every weekend and blared videos calling him a pedophile and a pervert. Most recently, Cassidy Hutchinson has received death threats for testifying before Congress.

No doubt many Trump’s supporters, senators among them, persist in their loyalty to a delusional tyrant because they have been, or are afraid they will be, threatened with similar threats and/or exposure. So long as Trump continues to hold the Republican Party in thrall, Biden may be president, but we will continue to be subject to the abusive tactics of a man who will stop at nothing to retake the power he feels entitled to.

We may take some solace in the knowledge that fascist regimes have historically been short-lived. In time, Adolf Hitler, Juan Peron, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, were all vanquished. But we can’t afford to be complacent about such a dire threat. We must act to stop the drift toward fascism by voting across the board for Democrats, the party that represents our values, the lives we want to lead, and our democracy.

Linda Skernick
Bath

Commentary from Sagadahoc Democrats

When Did it Become OK?

Lately, we have found ourselves shocked on an almost daily basis by events happening in our country or by outrageous comments made by our legislators, and we have found ourselves thinking, “When did this become OK?” And when we experience yet another heartbreaking, tragic, senseless school shooting, we must ask:

When did it become OK that, after Columbine, another 13 mass school shootings in the US have taken nearly 170 innocent lives and yet nothing has changed? When did it become OK that the only lesson we have learned from this carnage is to “live” with it? When did it become OK that today, in this country there are over 20 million privately owned AR-15 style rifles whose sole purpose is to kill humans quickly and efficiently?  

When did it become OK that our children have to be trained in “active shooter drills” in school? Or that we even consider asking teachers to be armed? When did it become OK for institutions of learning to barricade themselves behind armed officers, entry protocols and electronic surveillance as if living under siege? When did Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Parkland, Uvalde, become OK? When did Buffalo, NY become OK? When did it become OK for our legislators to do nothing about gun violence? 

When did it become OK for legislators to stop legislating; for an entire political party to proudly state that it will be 100% focused on obstructing lawmaking, to declare that they will have NO party platform, NO debates? 

When did it become OK for supreme court nominees to lie to the Senate, crafting carefully worded answers to give the impression that they believed Roe was legal precedent? 

When did it become OK to take away a woman’s right to choose what is best for her and her family; to declare them to be wards of the state during their pregnancies? Republicans call for the “right to life” of the unborn but once out of the womb children are on their own: no commonsense gun laws to protect them, no affordable childcare, education, healthcare to nurture them, no paid family leave to help care for them. 

When did it become OK for proven science to be a point for debate, for alternative facts to be a new standard, or for hateful rhetoric to be the new talking points of the right? When did it become OK to try and overturn a free and fair election or to deny access to the ballot box?   

Almost every day a new outrage, a new heartbreak, a new reason to say: THIS IS NOT OK! THIS IS NOT OK! Neither is it OK to declare the mid-terms a done deal—that the Republicans are bound to win back the house and the senate. Because with each of our votes, our friends’, our family’s, and our neighbor’s votes, we can demand change and say: this is not OK!

Marcy and Christian Leger

Bath 

Emmett Till’s Legacy

In August, 1955, a 14-year-old Mississippi boy was abducted, brutally beaten, and lynched for allegedly offending a white woman. His corpse was found three days later, identifiable only by means of a distinctive ring on his finger. His name was Emmett Till and when his suspected killers, two white men, were acquitted by an all-white jury, the outcome so offended the nation’s conscience as to serve as a tipping point in the political culture of the day, triggering a new phase in the Civil Rights movement and making Emmett Till a household name. 

The recent killing of 19 grade-school children by a deranged 18-year-old in Texas, was every bit as brutal as the Till murder, and all the more appalling for the number of victims involved, a number facilitated by the killer’s use of an AR-15 assault rifle. Though such weapons were banned in 1994, ten years later, under the George W. Bush administration, the ban was allowed to lapse and once again Americans were allowed to keep and bear these weapons of war. 

At this point, it seems the Second Amendment has become little more than a prescription for wholesale murder of the most casual and unconscionable variety. Meanwhile, the response of well-funded Republican politicians has been to trot out the time-dishonored “good-guy-with-a-gun theory”—a quack cure long since debunked by statistics showing that as little as three percent of such incidents are resolved by so-called good guys with guns.  

But Republican culpability goes well beyond advocacy-for-hire politics. One of the saddest spectacles of January 6 was the insurrectionists’ pretense of taking part in a “1776 moment.” Clearly implicit in the party’s posturing on gun rights is the less-than-subtle threat of another Revolution, if not Civil War, to be carried out by well-armed domestic terrorists masquerading as defenders of American liberty. 

And let’s face it, we are well past the threat stage; the war is already here and its casualties are children whose lives are being sacrificed in the name of bizarre Republican notions of patriotism, children like ten-year-old Maite Rodriguez, whose green sneaker—a symbolic heart carefully drawn upon its toe cap—was found amid the chaos of the classroom where she died. If we as an electorate cannot find the means to redeem her sacrifice and those of her schoolmates with meaningful political action, then our whole system of government is well on its way to becoming a dead letter.

Even so, a tipping point may be at hand. As it happens, some two months ago the Emmett Till Antilynching Act was signed into law by President Biden—a timely if overdue effort to address a long-ago injustice. In the weeks and months ahead, it will be our duty as citizens of a popular democracy to honor the innocent victims of our own day by identifying and voting out of office all candidates who place the right to bear arms above the right of school children like Maite to simply live. 

Dave Inglehart

Bath

Republican Cowboys

Heather Cox Richardson, the historian and political analyst, reminds us that in the 1950s, as in the late nineteenth century, the wild west was the American fantasy of choice, and the cowboy, personified by actors like John Wayne, was the great American hero. Cowboys, we were told, lived on their own terms in defiance of authority, and defended their families and property by shooting up anyone who posed a threat, real or perceived. The gun was law, and many Americans longed to live the free and unfettered life of a cowboy. We were fed the myth of the cowboy as hero and swallowed it whole.

Republican legislators, it seems, have taken this ball and run with it. Many of them have internalized the cowboy myth such that they support ready access not only to guns designed for personal protection, but to automatic weapons designed for war. For them these guns are just an extension of the cowboy ethos into the modern day. But the scariest thing is the obliviousness of these Republicans to the staggering number of innocent victims of those who use these guns to shoot people in grocery stores, movie theaters, night clubs, and, please, let’s not forget our schools. Our children are being shot and killed in large part because our legislators insist that it is the right of Americans to own and carry these weapons wherever they choose. 

In 2004, a ten-year federal ban on assault weapons expired; mass shootings have tripled since then. According to Richardson, there were 400,000 AR-15 style rifles in this country before the ban, in 1994, and today there are 20,000,000. By her count there have been 3,500 mass shootings since Sandy Hook Elementary School, yet many Republicans refuse to do anything other than claim we need more guns to take out the shooters. Senator Ted Cruz says we need fewer doors in schools to prevent easy access by shooters (never mind the need for easy escape routes for their targets). A guest on Fox News suggested we put “mantraps” and trip wires in the schools (what could go wrong there?).

Richardson asks, “How have we arrived at a place where 90% of Americans want to protect our children from gun violence, and yet those who are supposed to represent us in the government are unable, or unwilling to do so?”

Let’s not forget, while we speak of the callousness of many right-wing senators, that 1,002,920 people have died of Covid 19, most of whom were unvaccinated and many of whom refused to wear masks. Yet the vast majority of Republican legislators have not encouraged vaccination or masking, nor have they allocated funds for testing or treatment. 

What has happened to caring for and protecting human life? We need to support and vote for Democrats, who have widely encouraged vaccination, masking, and gun control, as opposed to the Republican cowboys who support none of this agenda. Please, let’s care for and protect each other.

Linda Skernick
Bath

Gun Laws in Maine

Laws surrounding guns have become of critical concern for many Americans, and I am one of them. I am angry, frightened, and discouraged with the ever-increasing number of mass shootings sweeping across our country. There are over twenty thousand laws on the books at the local, state, and federal levels, laws dealing specifically with firearms, regulating their manufacture, trade, possession, transfer, record keeping, and destruction. These laws are enforced by state agencies and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). For all of their profusion, however, these laws are clearly inadequate. They certainly didn’t protect the children in last week’s school shooting, and they haven’t kept us safe at churches, malls, restaurants, bars, and elsewhere. 

One federal law that is front and center because of recent events is the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, Maine’s iteration of which prohibits possession of a firearm on public school property or the property of an approved private school. Some of Maine’s larger towns have created a position known as Resource Officer, a police officer assigned to monitor school hallways. Other towns have opted not to do so for fear of traumatizing students, but on balance I think the position stands to prevent more trauma than it might cause. 

Maine is a gun owning state and gun friendly. We are not a “stand your ground” state, but a Castle Doctrine state, whereby one is “justified in the use of deadly force to protect one’s home and its inhabitants from intruders, without being obliged to retreat.” Anyone over the age of 21 can legally possess a firearm openly or concealed, and a Rand survey shows that 46.8% of adults in Maine have at least one gun at home. My husband is a hunter; we have rifles, handguns, and bows, all locked in a gun locker, where they belong. 

Even so, the list of Maine gun regulations seems excessively permissive, as the following list suggests:

• No state permit to purchase rifles, shotguns, and handguns.
• No requirement to registrar a firearm.
• No assault weapon law
• No magazine capacity restriction 
• No licensing of owners
• No permit required for concealed carry
• No permit required for open carry
• No background checks required for private sales
• No permit required for a loaded gun in a car. 
• Yes to owning a gun suppressor (silencer). 
• Yes to carrying a gun in a bar, unless posted. 
• Yes to carrying a gun in Acadia National Park if you have a Maine permit or from a state Maine honors. 

According to everytownresearch.org, in an average year 146 people die by guns in Maine. With a rate of 9.9 deaths per 100,000 people, Maine is ranked 40th in gun deaths in the United States. I am heartened to see that Maine’s rate is low compared to other states, but this fact should not encourage us to let our guard down. On May 25, News Center Maine reported ten violent threats in Maine schools over the last 30 days, four within one week. Let that sink in. 

Candace Guerette
Topsham

Dear Readers,

Now more than ever, we’d like to hear from you! Let us know your thoughts on topics from today’s crowded news cycles to issues related to your own back yard. The Our Voices column will include articles of up to 500 words in length. Please send your submissions either as email attachments or in the body of an email to trubadorint@gmail.com.

Commentary from Sagadahoc Democrats

Mills v. LePage: Lest We Forget

Are there differences between the tenure of Paul LePage as governor and Janet Mills in the same role? Let us count the ways.

LePage refused 5 times to expand voter-approved Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, denying thousands access to basic care while he and his wife took advantage of their healthcare coverage to have weight loss surgery while he was governor. Governor Mills enacted Medicaid expansion on her first day in office. To date, 90,000+ Mainers now have access to care that had been denied.  

LePage ignored climate science and fought the expansion of solar installations at every opportunity. His interference in a contract that Norwegian energy company, Statoil, had made with the PUC caused the company to take its $2.5 billion investment in off-shore wind to the UK. Governor Mills has set the state on a path to achieve 80% of our energy needs with renewables by 2030, making Maine a leader in climate change progress.

Governor Mills brought to fruition a $40 million investment in the Lands for Maine’s future program. The Sportsmen’s Alliance characterized the program as “dangerously close to collapse” when LePage withheld $6.5 million in voter-approved LMF bonds.

Despite tragic losses from covid-19, Governor Mills has guided the state through a pandemic with some of the lowest death rates and highest vaccination rates in the country. LePage mused about how he’d handle a pandemic saying, if we “all do our part” we can avoid lockdowns, etc. No clue what that means.

But the real differences may be in tone and style, and that really matters when you need collaboration and consensus to get public policy enacted. The state is confronting issues that will take everyone at the table to solve. “My way or the highway” won’t work.  

Senator Roger Katz, a Republican who served with LePage spoke of “… a legacy of missed opportunities.” LePage was “unable to sit down with well-meaning people in both parties and listen and compromise and try to get to middle ground.”  

Sandy Maisel, chair of the Political Science Department at Colby said LePage made politics “personal and nasty. Maine has had tough politicians, but none demonized their opponents and the concept of public service as has Paul LePage.”

Sara Gideon, who was Speaker of the Maine House while LePage was governor felt a “period of healing would be necessary” after LePage left office, “… a shift of the culture … back to a desire to function.”

Bill Nemitz, columnist for the Portland Press Herald wrote, LePage “… repeatedly, as a matter of policy, turned his back on the people who need government the most.”

Janet Mills loves Maine and that comes through in any public speech she makes. Who remembers something positive Paul LePage said about Maine?

Lepage says he’s changed, but the phrase “lipstick on a pig” keeps coming to mind. When someone shows you who they are, believe them.  

We know Paul LePage. Maine can’t afford more Paul LePage.  

Mary Ann Larson 
Cumberland 

(All quotations from The Maine Monitor, December 19, 2018.)

Representative Jared Golden for Congress

Maine’s Congressman Jared Golden (D) is running for re-election in Maine’s second district. His opposition is Bruce Poliquin (R), who lost the seat to Golden in the last election. April’s newsletter contained examples of why Poliquin should not be reelected. This article will look at the same three issues we did with Poliquin: Environment, Healthcare and Tourism.

Environment: National Environmental Scorecard gave Rep. Golden a lifetime score 94%. Poliquin’s was 16%). Of over seventy votes on environmental issues, Golden voted yes on all but four and was excused for one.

Healthcare: Congressman Golden is a defender of the Affordable Care Act. He has been a champion of prioritizing lowering out-of-pocket drug costs for seniors on Medicare. He supported bills to lower prescription drug prices and bills to expand Medicare coverage, including dental, hearing and vision care.

Tourism: Along with Senator King, Golden introduced a bill to designate a Down East Heritage Area in Washington and Hancock counties. The bill recognizes the contributions of Downeast Maine’s agriculture – including blueberries, heritage fishing and forestry. There are currently 55 National Heritage areas across the country.

Congressman Golden understands how important it is to stay in touch with his constituents. He has consistently held town-hall type meetings throughout his large district. Some of the towns included are Dixfield, Farmington, East Millinocket, and Island Falls. He held a healthcare roundtable in Bangor and in Blue Hill had an open coffee-hour meeting with small business leaders. In Stonington he met with lobstermen to discuss the impact of NOAA’s proposed regulation on the lobstering community.

Congressman Golden serves on the House Armed Services Committee. He serves on the Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee and the Readiness Subcommittee. He also serves on the House Small Business Committee. He is the Chairman of the Underserved, Agricultural, and Rural Business Development Subcommittee. The Congressman is a member of over twenty caucuses/task forces.

Some of the legislation he has sponsored or co-sponsored are important to the welfare of many of Maine’s citizens. They include The Careers Act, Disaster Assistance for Rural Communities, Responsible Ownership of Firearms Act of 2021 and the DHS Rural and Remote Hiring and Retention Strategy Act of 2022.

Congressman Golden and family live in Lewiston. He was in the Marine Corps infantry and served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is a graduate of Bates College.


Candace Guerette

Topsham

Candidate Orion Breen

Thank you Sagadahoc Dems for all the little things you do to make this an amazing place to live, and a special thanks to everyone who has made a $5 clean election contribution through www.maine.gov/cleanelections. I’m Orion Breen and I’m running to represent the new House District 98 which includes parts of Topsham, Bowdoin, and Lisbon as well as Durham and Pownal.

Neighbors helping neighbors is what makes this such a special community. Working together we make a difference on the things that really matter. Our economy and our children will be feeling the effects of the pandemic for years. The rise of mental health and substance abuse issues is literally a matter of life and death. But when we come together and really listen to one another we can come up with better answers by which we can all thrive, not just survive the challenges we are facing, and even turn them into opportunities to build stronger communities.

We need to use our heart and our head. We need compassion and fiscal responsibility. We need to make sure our tax dollars get the best return on their investment. We should constantly reevaluate our programs and rules to see if they are achieving clear goals. That’s why we need to bring everyone to the table. Even folks who don’t like a policy may have a perspective that can improve it, if we really listen to each other. Compassion doesn’t do much good without accountability, which is something embraced even in the nonprofit world.

As a volunteer with United Way, I’ve helped decide where millions of dollars are invested in the community, and every year programs are reevaluated to make sure they are on track with real data on the number of people helped and how. We should do the same in Augusta. On the chamber of commerce’s advocacy committee, I’ve helped prioritize goals of increasing the affordability of housing, childcare, transportation and energy. These are investments that will pay dividends and help businesses and families across the region, and they are morally the right thing to do.

It’s easy to get pessimistic, but just this year we saw progressive groups like the Maine People’s Alliance, environmental groups like the Natural Resources Council of Maine, and business groups like the state and regional chambers of commerce all come together in support of more affordable housing, proving that Mainers continue to come together to get things done. If elected, I will follow the pledge I took as an AmeriCorps Volunteer in Service to America: “I will get things done for America – to make our people safer, smarter, and healthier. I will bring Americans together to strengthen our communities. Faced with apathy, I will take action. Faced with conflict, I will seek common ground. Faced with adversity, I will persevere.”


Orion Breen
Durham

Why I am Running for Office

I am running for office because I care about our community and want to see all of us, from our youngest to our oldest residents, thrive. Like many of us, I was raised to ‘leave things better than I found them’ and running for office is one of the most impactful ways I can think of to work on making things better for current and future generations of Mainers. There are many ways we can work on achieving this goal, including increasing access to healthcare, supporting and expanding education starting with universal pre-K, and addressing the impacts of climate change head on. There are many who came before me that had the political will to do meaningful work on these issues. I also have that will and intend to continue that good work. Mainers deserve to grow up and live in a healthy and safe environment – one where they will do well, where they will feel they are part of a community, and where they will have access to the resources necessary to live fulfilling and productive lives. It is our duty as responsible citizens to pave the way for future generations, just as previous generations did for each of us. Together we can keep Maine on the path of progress.

Rebecca Jauch 

Candidate for House District 51 (Topsham)