• Donate
Sagadahoc Democrats
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Elected Officials
  • Our Towns
    • Arrowsic
    • Bath
    • Bowdoin
    • Bowdoinham
    • Georgetown
    • Phippsburg
    • Richmond
    • Topsham
    • West Bath
    • Woolwich

Archives

Our Voices: April 2022

Commentary from Sagadahoc Democrats


Justice Undone

According to a familiar theory of jurisprudence, “Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done.” The implication here is that judges have an obligation not only to be fair in their rulings, but to conduct themselves so as to earn the public’s trust in their fairness. By this standard, Justice Clarence Thomas’ involvement in the recent Supreme Court case regarding the release of email messages related to the January 6 insurrection reveals a stunning dereliction of duty on his part. 

Many of the most damning of these emails, after all, were written by his wife, radical right-wing activist and D.C. gadfly Virginia Thomas, who was herself a participant in the infamous rally that preceded the attempted coup. Her husband’s refusal to recuse himself in the face of these facts raised immediate alarms about his impartiality. His vote to block congressional access to the emails removed all doubt about the matter, giving evidence of his own corrupt partisanship.  

Unfortunately, this comes as no surprise. Many observers of the current scandal will recall Thomas’ 1991 Senate confirmation hearings, in which Anita Hill, a former co-worker in the Department of Education, described conduct on his part that would spark a national conversation on sexual harassment. His response was to refer to the televised proceedings as a “high-tech lynching,” casting himself as a victim of racism, and invoking partisan conspiracy theories in his defense. Despite the unseemly optics of his performance, he won confirmation and has nursed bitter resentments ever since, earning a reputation as the Supreme Court’s most reliably sullen member. 

Meanwhile, shortly after becoming the lone voice in support of blocking the insurrection emails, Justice Thomas disappeared from public view. According to initial reports, he was hospitalized with flu-like symptoms, but subsequent accounts have cast doubt on what, if anything, was ailing him. It is also worth noting that his disappearance came at a politically expedient moment, enabling him to remain incommunicado for several weeks, a hiatus that ended only with the revelation of his wife’s emails.

Since then, the January 6 committee has announced its intention to call Virginia Thomas to testify about her role as a January 6 conspirator, which testimony will likely bear on her husband’s role in seeking to defeat the pursuit of justice in a matter of close personal interest. Under the circumstances, compelling Justice Thomas to recuse himself from all upcoming January 6 cases represents the least of available remedies to the damage he has done—and continues to pose—to the high court’s credibility. While a lack of sufficient regulation of the court makes his impeachment a difficult prospect, he deserves nothing less.

At this point, it seems, the public’s only solace lies in another old saying: “The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.” After more than thirty years spent in the gristmill of partisan politics, Justice Thomas’ fractious tenure may at last be coming to an end.
 

Dave Inglehart

Bath


Siri Beckman, 2022

Reproductive Health in Maine

In March, Dr. Julia Kahrl was inducted into the Maine Women’s Hall of Fame, a well-deserved honor. For more than six decades, Dr. Kahrl has supported women’s reproductive health in the United States and in Asia, Africa, and South America. Several years ago, Dr. Kahrl founded GRR, Grandmothers for Reproductive Rights, a “kitchen table” movement that has expanded nationwide. Dr. Kahrl recognized that the assaults on Roe vs Wade were rapidly gaining traction and believed that women who’d grown up in the era before abortion was legalized would have powerful stories to share with younger generations.

Last September, the Supreme Court voted to allow the radical Texas law regarding abortions to stand. Janet Mills described this as “a dog whistle to extremists that they can and should push forward their anti-choice agenda in statehouses across the country.” Since January, 519 abortion restrictions have been introduced in forty-one states, and in the last year, an “unprecedented” number of anti-choice bills were put forward by Maine Republican legislators. This, despite the fact that, according to a recent Pew survey, 64% of Mainers support a woman’s right to make reproductive decisions appropriate for herself and for her family’s wellbeing.

In response, a number of states have created legislation that would solidify protection under state law. Janet Mills is clear in her stance. “As long as I am governor, I will stand to protect the rights of women and I will fight every and any threat to undermine, roll back, or outright eliminate access to reproductive health care services.” Chellie Pingree and Jared Golden are equally clear, voting for Senator King’s co-sponsored Women’s Health Protection Act, which passed in the House and failed in the Senate.

Maine’s anti-choice Republican candidates, however, recognize the unpopularity of their position and are responding to direct questions in vague terms. While governor, Paul LePage frequently attended anti-abortion rallies but now side-steps the question, stating only that he would do whatever he could as governor to “further promote adoption.” Though Bruce Poliquin is not publicizing his anti-choice position, while in Congress he voted in 2015 to ban abortion; he also voted for the American Health Care Act, which would have defunded Planned Parenthood, which currently provides routine health care for more than 10,000 Mainers. 

Though in the minority, the anti-abortion forces in Maine are strong and well-organized, and especially effective with social media. As we witness what’s happening in Texas, Idaho, and Mississippi, we must recognize that it could happen here in Maine. Let’s widen the discussion, moreover, to remind voters of the implications of the loss of reproductive choice. Dr. Kahrl was honored by the Maine Women’s Hall of Fame not only for her work with reproductive rights but also for her support for local and international conservation efforts. She’d be the first to say that reproductive choice is inextricably linked with education, poverty, and climate change. Women’s reproductive health is not a women’s issue, it affects everyone. As always, we must beat the drum: every vote counts, now, more than ever.
 

Donna Inglehart

Bath 


Bruce Poliquin: A Pattern of Evasion

This November Maine voters will once again find Bruce Poliquin on the ballot for Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, a seat he held from 2015 to 2019, now held by Democrat Jared Golden. A quick refresher on Poliquin’s legislative career reveals why we must prevent him from retaking this seat.

Environment: The National Environmental Scorecard gave Poliquin a lifetime score of 16% on the basis of his no votes for initiatives on climate change, wildlife, and clean water, all critical issues for our ecological future. 

Healthcare: In May, 2017, Poliquin voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act (and later denied having done so on a television broadcast on WMTW).

Tourism: Poliquin opposed the creation of the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument despite the initiative’s significant local support and potential economic impact. Following its passage in 2021, the new national park attracted 41,000 visitors, who spent $2.7 million in nearby communities.

Documented concerns:

  • August 25, 2017: The Maine People’s Alliance shared a recording of Poliquin saying: “It would be stupid for me to engage the national media to give them and everybody else the ammunition they need, and we would lose this seat… but I get it.”
  • August 2018: Slate’s Jim Newell reported that Republican leaders claimed they were close to getting votes to pass the Affordable Care Act. When asked if he had made a decision on the matter, Poliquin said nothing and suddenly headed for the restroom. When he emerged several minutes later, he was wearing earbuds and scurried away.
  • October 12, 2018: The Kennebec Journal reported that Poliquin sent a letter to constituents implying that the shuttered Madison Paper mill was to be reopened. The taxpayer-funded letter, dated Sept. 20, 2018, cited an International Trade Commission ruling in 2015 allowing for continued duties on Canadian paper imports as key to “saving more than 200 jobs at Madison Paper and keeping the facility operating and producing their quality product.” In fact, the Somerset County mill closed in May 2016, laying off some 215 people, increasing property taxes in Madison and adding to the loss of paper industry jobs in Maine. The letter, signed by Poliquin, came weeks before he stood for re-election and made no mention of the mill closure or the job losses. “The constituent mailing was in fact sent in error,” said Brenda Conley, a spokesperson for Poliquin.  

In addition to what these highlights convey about Mr. Poliquin’s policy decisions, they suggest a pattern of evasion we have seen far too often from members of his party, and which clearly do not warrant his reelection. 

 
Candace Guerette

Topsham


A Great Shame

I was outraged, no, horrified, to watch many Republican senators during the confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson. They bullied her, badgered her, and verbally beat her up. This is no way to treat a Supreme Court nominee, or address a federal judge with her history and qualifications, it’s no way to treat a woman, and ultimately no way to treat a fellow human being. One senator repeatedly asked her questions she had already answered, then yelled rudely over her without permitting her to answer. He, and many other Republican senators, seemed to use the hearings only to overwhelm the airways with their own sick agenda and demonstrate that they were against her simply because the Democrats were for her. Common decency, respect, fairness–all were forgotten. So many Republicans, with some exceptions, possibly including Susan Collins, were behaving like thugs, without even the self-respect to be embarrassed by their own behavior.

Linda Skernick

Bath

  • April 15, 2022
  • 0
  • 79
  • Community, Newsletter
  • More

Our Voices: March 2022

Topical articles from members of our community.

Freedom Revisited

It has now been well over a year since Republicans lost control of the presidency and both houses of Congress, yet rather than accept reality and work to improve their voter-appeal (articulating a coherent party platform would be a good start) they have contrived to mount an insurrection and undertake on a campaign of lies calling into question the integrity of an election they clearly lost by a wide margin. Equally offensive has been their effort to distract from an early failure to take the corona virus seriously by characterizing all efforts to defeat the pandemic as violations of God-given American freedoms. 

What these freedoms consist of is anyone’s guess. The Constitution, after all, makes no mention of a freedom to spread deadly disease. Then too, what ever happened to the notion that freedom isn’t free? –that it is paid for by true patriots such as the Ukrainians now giving their all for their country. For Republicans, meanwhile, patriotism seems to have no greater champions than a bunch of self-appointed militia wannabes intent on obstructing traffic from the comfort of their well-appointed trucks. 

Much has been said about the threat such Republican “protests” pose to our democratic traditions, but in truth they are attacks on the notion of government itself. According to English philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, government is based on an idea known as the “social contract,” a metaphorical agreement whereby at some point on our path to adulthood we all consent to join organized society. Hobbes in particular argued that this consent inevitably entails giving up certain freedoms in order to gain the blessings of human civilization—sacrificial freedoms like the ones today’s anti-vax truckers insist on asserting with such mindless conviction. 

Arguably the greatest blessing of American democracy is its grounding in the liberal ideology of thinkers like Locke and Hobbes, whose views were widely adopted by our Founding Fathers and have lighted our way ever since. It remains to be seen whether the principles they espoused will continue to prevail against those here at home and in Putin’s Russia who would sacrifice truth and the Common Good for subversive ends. 

Dave Inglehart

Bath



Securing the Vote

Americans are told repeatedly that we can do something to help change things for the better, if we vote. But does each and every one of our votes still count?

Maine’s Independent Senator Angus King is spearheading a bill, designed to update the antiquated Electoral Count Act. He is joined by Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).The bill, called the Electoral Count Modernization Act, would support free and fair elections in which all of our votes do indeed still count. Senator King maintains that new laws are needed to inhibit attempts to disenfranchise voters, and that those laws would help secure our election procedures from bad actors like last year’s January 6 insurrectionists, or those who try to overturn elections by shouting “fraud” when there is none.

A discussion draft of the Electoral Count Modernization Act was released in February. In the words of Senator King, “The bill would address many of the concerns vocalized by experts across the political spectrum with the current Electoral Count Act, including the role of the Vice President, how states certify electors, and the threshold needed to challenge election results.”

He goes on to say, “This is an incredibly important effort – but updating the Electoral Count Act should not be mistaken for a substitute for confronting the wider crises facing our democracy. I continue to support legislation to protect voting rights prior to Election Day, and strongly believe that we must clarify ambiguities in the electoral process after Election Day to truly ensure the will of the voters will prevail. Together, my colleagues and I… look forward to contributing to a strong, bipartisan effort aimed at resolving this issue and strengthening our democracy.”

There are many threats facing our democracy here and around the world. The war forced upon Ukrainians by Russia’s ex-KGB leader presents the most pressing example, creating both a political and humanitarian crisis. And the fact that there are those in this country who have openly expressed approval of Mr. Putin for his “strong leadership” provides ongoing evidence that we are not immune from such threats. We must protect and defend democracy to preserve our system of government and hand it over to our children. Ensuring the right and access to free and fair elections for each and every American is the surest way to accomplish this.

Linda Skernick

Bath


Ranked-choice Voting in Maine

I have heard too many voters express relief that Maine will use Ranked Choice Voting in this year’s election for Governor. Unfortunately, this is not true. On May 23, 2017 Maine’s Supreme Judicial Court issued a unanimous opinion advising that Maine ranked-choice voting law conflicted with Maine’s Constitution so that it could not be used in General Elections for Governor, the Maine State Senate, or the Maine House of Representatives—these are offices for which plurality voting is specified in our Constitution. 

Maine has a tradition of electing governors with pluralities well below the level of a majority: Angus King won his first term as Governor in 1994 with 35% of the vote, John Baldacci won in 2006 with 38.1%, and Paul LePage won in 2010 with 37.6% (he won in 2014 with 48.2%). Since 1990 only two of our Governors were elected by a majority of voters: Angus King in 1998 by 58.6%, and Janet Mills in 2018 by 50.9%.

At this point the following have announced they are running for Governor:

Democratic Party: Janet Mills and John Glowa

Republican Party: Paul LePage

Maine Green Independent Party: Michael Barden

Libertarian Party: no announced candidates yet and

Michael Heath, and Tom Saviello are unaffiliated individuals who have announced they are running independent campaigns.

Candidates are currently gathering signatures from voters. Party Candidates must collect at least 2,000 validated signatures from members of their respective Parties by March 15, 2022. Non-Party Candidates must submit at least 4,000 validated signatures by June 1, 2022 and must remain unenrolled from March 1st until the general election in order to remain qualified as an unenrolled candidate.

At this point it appears highly likely there will be at least three candidates on the November Ballot for Governor, and it is possible there will be four candidates. The winner is likely to be decided by a plurality of the voters.

Remembering Governor Paul LePage, what advice do I give voters? First carefully consider whether it is advisable to sign Candidate’s Petitions. If a candidate doesn’t get enough signatures, they cannot be on the ballot. While one should vote for one’s preference in any Primary election, I believe the most important consideration in November’s General Election will be: do you want to see Paul LePage back in Blaine House in January of 2023? If not, you need to do everything you can to ensure that one of his opponents has the plurality. Paul’s supporters are already in full swing to win the race!

Bruce Hauptli

Bath

  • March 15, 2022
  • 0
  • 145
  • Community, Newsletter
  • More

Our Voices: February 2022

Topical articles from members of our community.

Maine’s Democratic Traditions

Like many people in my generation, I gave up on network television, and hence the 24-hour news cycle, over a decade ago. This December, however, as broadcasts blared incessantly from a family member’s television, I was reminded how large, looming and apocalyptic network news can be – challenging all of us to believe we can make a difference in this expansive, complicated world.

I suppose, though, there is a reason “Think Globally, Act Locally” is a saying with a long legacy. It provides hope, slicing a pie otherwise too big to bite into manageable pieces. In Maine we are fortunate to benefit from policies designed to keep power in the hands of our people.

Citizens Initiatives

Did you know that fewer than half of the 50 States provide the opportunity for a citizen’s initiative to alter State statute? The recent “Yes on 1 Campaign” to block CMP’s transmission line is a recent high-stakes and successful example. The only other state on the East Coast that gives this type of power to its people is Massachusetts. 

Citizen Referendum

Similar to the citizens’ initiative, but not exactly the same, the referendum allows citizens to either uphold or appeal a recently enacted law. It also exists in fewer than half of the 50 States. It was recently used to bring the leverage of ranked choice voting (RCV) to Maine’s populace sooner, rather than later.

Ranked Choice Voting

Only two States in the entire country have enacted RCV statewide – Maine and Alaska! Why does RCV matter? Because it allows one to vote passionately and practically. If your preferred candidate happens to be outside or on the fringes of the one of the two major parties, you can still cast your vote for that person without risk of “splitting the vote” or “throwing the election.” If your first-choice candidate doesn’t receive a threshold of votes, then your vote is credited to your second choice candidate. 

Electoral Votes

It’s not new news that Maine is only one of two states to split its electoral votes; however, the fact that Maine has been doing this since 1972 does not make it any less noteworthy. In fact, recent history makes it all the more so. Maine’s electoral votes have only been split twice – in the two most recent presidential elections. While the answer to the nation’s electoral college woes is complicated, no doubt an alternative to the “winner take all” system better reflects the diversity of the citizens within a state’s borders.  

How did Maine so disproportionately end up with so many policies that taken together exist in far fewer than half the States? I attribute it to Maine’s people, who are fiercely independent yet intrinsically woven together, caring for each other as much as they care for themselves. What we have to recognize now is that, as Mainers, we need to stay involved to keep it that way. We really can make a difference!

Jean Guzzetti

Bath



Making Political Donations Count

The midterm election is less than 10 months away. Besides supporting Maine Democrats up and down the ballot, we Democrats need to do what we can to maintain our majority in the Senate and House. Every day we receive requests for funding from candidates as well as Democratic committees and PACs. How do we choose which to support so that our contributions will make the most difference?  

Sending money to a specific candidate or to national Democratic committees and PACs is certainly one way to go; however, supporting organizations focused on voter turnout may deliver the most bang for the buck. For one thing, it is likely that competitive federal and gubernatorial candidate campaigns and their allied PACs will be well funded. For another, voter turnout is bound to be just as critical in 2022 as it was in 2021, and remobilizing the Blue Wave will be challenging as midterm turnout is typically lower, especially among voters whose party is in power. While candidates and PACs often include activities to support voter turnout, there are organizations specifically focused on voter registration (VR) and get-out-the-vote (GOTV) activities, getting Democratic-leaning voters registered and to the polls.  

VR and GOTV organizations worth considering include The Voter Participation Center, which focuses on registering people of color, unmarried women, and young people; The Center for Voter Information, which targets registering a broader population; and The Everybody Votes Campaign, which focuses on site-based voter registration efforts targeting communities of color. There are many national organizations such as Rock the Vote working on voter turnout, including supporting and training local grassroots groups. There are also organizations that have a broader approach, such as Stacy Abram’s Fair Fight, which, in addition to supporting voter turnout, also supports voter protection and progressive leaders. Then there are organizations such as Indivisible that have multiple missions, including providing local groups with tools to win elections, and Sister District, whichfocuses on voter turnout and supporting down-ballot races in key states.   

For more information, consider websites such as Blue Tent, which helps progressive donors give with maximum impact by evaluating both electoral and nonprofit organizations, and Charity Navigator, whichevaluates 501(c)(3) charitable organizations that support voting rights.  

Finally, don’t delay. Donating now, early in the election cycle, will have the biggest impact. VR and GOTV activities are most successful if they occur early and often, and can be especially effective if they bring local grassroots organizations into the process for training and collaboration, which takes time and money. Don’t underestimate the importance of making even a small donation. Small donors make a difference—in 2020, at least 20 million small donors gave a record-breaking $4 billion to federal races. Let’s dig deep again in 2022 to support our Maine Democratic candidates and our national Democratic agenda.  

Larry Hobel and Diana Staring

Days Ferry


Why I’m Involved

I am a Democrat.

Today’s political culture – be it statewide or nationwide – is failing my generation. Because of the pressing issues facing our country, we have been asked to put band-aids over gaping wounds. We have stepped forward to share our voices to protect the safety of our environment and ourselves, regardless of sex, gender identity, religion, race, ethnicity, and all other characteristics that makeup who we are. I am fortunate to have the opportunity to raise my voice during a time of hardship for our country. 

Not infrequently I see a post on my Instagram feed, a notification on my phone, or a news story that makes me wonder: Why? Why is this happening? How could it have been prevented? And not infrequently I wonder what I can do to help. How can I speak for those who cannot? How can I play a part? 

I have always valued the well-being of others and the promotion of compassion for all. I am most passionate about Civil Rights issues, as well as ensuring the safety and well-being of our schools, and on a larger scale, our planet. As a young person, I believe that my voice is important in keeping our democracy alive. I believe that my voice is important in advocating for myself and others. I believe that my voice is important in maintaining my place – and rights – in this country. I believe that we all must speak out when we see injustice. Protest. Advocate. Practice passive resistance. Communicate. Share stories. 

I am involved in politics to do all of these things. When in college, I plan to be a journalism major with a minor in political sciences. I want to spend my life experiencing cultures different from my own and hearing stories from individuals. I want to learn more about governmental policies and decision-making processes. I want to continue advocating for my passions and priorities.

We, as a county, state, and nation, must work together to achieve our goals for each other and for ourselves.

I am a Democrat, and proud to be one. 

Addie Hinds

Grade 10, Morse High School

  • February 15, 2022
  • 0
  • 121
  • Community, Newsletter
  • More
Page 3 of 4«1234»

Sign Up For Our Newsletter:

Subscribe to Newsletter

Recent Posts

  • Bowdoin Democrats meet July 7
  • Woolwich Dems meeting on July 10
  • Join us on July 4 in Bath
  • Our Voices: June 2022
  • You Are Invited: 2022 Spring Social

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • April 2021

Sign Up for our newsletter

Subscribe to Newsletter

Please donate to SCDC

Please Donate to SCDC
  • New Letter to the Editor Toolkit!

    1054 views
  • Our Voices: Jan 2022

    230 views
  • Office Hours Are Back

    217 views

Copyright Sagadahoc County Democratic Committee. All Rights Reserved